Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Friday, July 9, 2010
Any advice for a new teacher starting out. . .
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Are tests the only objective assessment of student learning?
As I pondered this idea during this assignment and I had to really think critically. And, in a word-no, I would not consider tests to be the only objective assessment of student learning; especially if by “objective”, one means, not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion (Dictionary.com, 2010).
There are a plethora of different methods through which a student’s true learning knowledge can be assessed which are, in deed, objective. Further, a vast majority of modern assessments measure what is learned more in-depth by allowing students to employ their higher thinking skills. Having students participate in a debate, for example, either for or against a given topic, allows them to synthesize information and formulate ideas which might not be perceived or understood as thoroughly if they were given a multiple-choice test.
Students participating in performances or presentations, while given more flexibility, typically recall at greater lengths the information presented due to the type of interaction that is required. Assessments such as these are called authentic assessment and are driven by a constructivist point of view. As Smaldino, Lowther, and Russell state, there is rising interest in authentic assessment, “because [it requires] students to use processes appropriate to the content and skills being learned and to how they are used in the real world, (p. 108, 2008).
In order to produce well-rounded students, a variety of assessment methods is desirable. Students need to be able to rely on their strengths. Assessments should consider learning styles and intelligences of the students. Tests, while heavily emphasized today, do have their place, but are more useful in providing a better overall picture of the student when combined with authentic assessments.
References:
Dictionary.com (2010). Retrieved June 22, 2010 fromhttp://dictionary.reference.com/browse/objective
Smaldino, S.C., Lowther, D.L. & Russell, J.D., (2008). Instructional technology and media for learning (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
The above video is on Authentic Assessment and I found it relevant. Suppose there were no authentic assessment? What would learning look like?
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
What does a technology infused classroom look like? Hmmm...
This is a video I found interesting on YouTube which discusses 3 phases of effectively integrating technology.
Smaldino, S.C., Lowther, D.L. & Russell, J.D. (2008). Instructional technology and media for learning (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Visual literacy and the internet in the classroom. . .
According to Smaldino, Lowther, and Russell, visual literacy is, “…the learned ability to interpret visual messages accurately and to create such messages”, (p. 52). Students are constantly gathering information from their environment and the internet and then decoding those visual stimuli. It would be safe to say that the internet and visual literacy can work hand-in-hand and significantly impact learning in the classroom. As teachers network and accumulate vast varieties of visuals for a range subjects, their students will have increasing opportunities to experience the world around them right in their classrooms.
This year I had the pleasure of having a most rare student, whose academic talents and desire for learning really stood out. Not only did her gifts stand out among her classmates, but they also stood out against other students that I have taught over the years. One day she told me she knew what the “DC” in Washington, DC meant. When I asked her how she found out, she explained that when she asked her mother for the meaning, her mother refused to tell her but challenged her to find out by herself. She admitted to me that she “Googled it”.
This video is composed of snapshots I took while we were studying the ocean. At the time, the focus was on hands-on learning. The children used the internet to watch a movie on BrainPop Jr. They made Rainbow Fish, read ocean stories, measured sea creatures, studied conservation, tasted sea kelp and seaweed, and got to touch a real squid. Fun learning was had by all!
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Use a variety of strategies to reach all learners. . .
Teaching today requires that teachers hold a range of instructional strategies in their repertoire. According to the constructivist point of view, “[students] must have an active role in the learning process; . . . they are not receptacles to be filled but rather engineers of their learning”, (Smaldino, Lowther, and Russell, 2008). Because of this, students need opportunities to discover, experiment, collaborate, ask questions, explore, play games, and investigate. There are a variety of strategies available for teachers to provide students ample environments that will suit each individual student’s learning style or modality. Technology will enable teachers to reach students and provide quality environments which push them toward higher order thinking.
The implementation of technology by teachers of 21st century learners can and will undoubtedly be essential in assuring each student is able to meet his or her educational goals, be able to think critically and independently as well as compete globally. This impacts my teaching because it pushes me away from my comfort zones. It also allows me to examine methods of teaching which are most effective in increasing student achievement, piquing their interest in learning, and it will hopefully improve their desire to continue learning for years to come.
This is a short movie of my students during centers. We were learning about magnets and the students worked with electromagnets with my student teacher, played computer games about magnets, played with magnetized cars, wrote magnet stories, and collaborated to create a magnet rap song. We had a ball!